Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Bharath Nishok Kumaran Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romios vs Kumaran analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Bharath Nishok Kumaran Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Romios 1 - 0 Kumaran
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romios has won 42.06% of points on their second serve, while Kumaran has won 45.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romios, in recent form, has won 36.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kumaran has won 49.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.36% and 24.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romios has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kumaran has saved 49.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romios has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 6/ 12), with Kumaran winning 45.71% (W/L 16/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 52/ 75). Kumaran has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 51/ 58), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 5/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Romios has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 26.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 11), where as Kumaran has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Romios winning 1 times and Kumaran being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Romios winning 2 and Kumaran winning 0. The last match between Romios and Kumaran was at the M25 Jakarta, 25-04-2023, Q3, Hard with Matthew Christopher Romios getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romios and Kumaran have played a deciding set 0 times, with Romios winning 0 times and Kumaran 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Romios winning 0, and Kumaran 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romios has played against opponents with an average rank of 367.28 while Kumaran has played against players with an average rank of 63.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romios has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kumaran has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romios has converted 28.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kumaran has converted 40.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
889
Rank
563
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
44% (91-115)
Career Total W/L
43% (56-73)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
23% (3-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Bharath Nishok Kumaran |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (20/39) | 51% (33/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 95% (19/20) | 55% (18/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (13/19) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (32/65) | 18% (7/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Bharath Nishok Kumaran |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 23% (3/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 15% (2/11) | 29% (8/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 34% (38/74) | 43% (119/158) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 25% (3/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.8 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 438.33 | 60.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (221/347) | 49% (240/492) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (141/221) | 68% (163/240) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (53/126) | 45% (114/252) |
| BPs Won% Total | 29% (4/14) | 41% (15/37) |
| Return Pts W% | 26% (85/325) | 34% (150/447) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (3/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 23% (3/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
11 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bharath Nishok Kumaran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 0-6 7-6(1) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yeongseok Jeong
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
43%
(
35 of
82)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 7-6(3) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Paul Woerner
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Chen-Yu Lu
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Romios Vs Kumaran Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
